The 'Science'. (a 'rant' by Lee)
When we talk about the of the paranormal people seem to fall
into one of two camps. The 'evangelical believers' or the 'ardent skeptics'.
I will try to explain with an analogy. My mother believes I will one day
meet the woman of my dreams produce many grandchildren for her and become
eternally happy. I however, believe that given my previous experience
and given my propensity for 'geeky' hobbies I will die old and alone in
a pool of my own bodily fluids. So who is right? Only time will tell and
I suspect the truth lies somewhere between the two.That's the approach
we try to use when carrying out investigations. Rather than jump at everything
and assume it is paranormal we will try to find logical explanations first
or 'debunk' the experience. Equally, we will admit when we cannot explain
something rationally.
As a scientist I have become very disheartened with the scientific establishment
labeling the paranormal as 'pseudo science'. We can experience phenomena
but as yet do not have sufficient meams to measure it accurately and consistently.
Many 'proper scientists' state that the evidence is inconsistent, has
a poor level of precision (i.e. it cannot be predicted or repeated) and
that it does not follow any known 'laws' in science. Yes, you're right,
there are too many variables but a lot of those criticisms could be levelled
against the weather. I can experience the weather, I can get wet or sunburnt
but as Michael Fish will tell you, it is very unpredictable. Just because
my burnt skin or level of saturation can be measured it has more credibility.
I
would like to get back to a time when scientists were more maverick, more
willing to put their reputations (and budgets) on the line and investigate
the validity (or lack thereof) of the paranormal. Many scientists in history
were ridiculed for the theories they had. Now? Yes, of course, we know
better now, we can measure it, we can repeat it, we have refined the theory
etc etc. Let’s go back and persuade Edison that his development
of a light that uses electricity won't work. Just look up how many times
he tried and failed. Just look at the inventions we have today courtesy
of science fiction, particularly Star Trek such as the mobile phone and
the hand writing recognition software developed by Apple.
So,
believers reign in your nerves and learn to look at things with a bit
more objectivity and scientists, try to be more open minded and share
your criticisms with those in the field so that together we may have a
'light bulb' moment.
|
|